[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100127102923.GB3460@in.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:59:23 +0530
From: "K.Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch 2/2][Bugfix][x86][hw-breakpoint] Fix return-code to
notifier chain in hw_breakpoint_handler
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:21:41PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 02:51:27PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
> > > >> Such a behaviour shouldn't be affected by the above change...your
> > > >> confirmation would help!
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Hi Jan,
> > > > I presume that the above explanation makes the role of this
> > > > patch/bugfix clear.
> > > >
> > > > Kindly let me know if you have any further queries.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Nope. There should be really no conflicts of your optimization with kvm.
> > >
> > > Jan
> > >
> > > --
> >
> > Hi Jan,
> > Thanks for the confirmation.
> >
> > Hi Frederic,
> > Can you pull these fixes in? (LKML references:
> > 20091226182725.GB9494@...ibm.com and 20091226182833.GC9494@...ibm.com).
>
>
> I got a deeper look at these patches and answered with some comments.
>
> If you address these, I can apply for .34 (because it's about optimizations
> and not fixes).
>
Sure, please apply them against a version that you deem appropriate.
Thanks,
K.Prasad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists