linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v3 0/5] x86, cacheinfo, amd: L3 Cache Index Disable fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100127121740.GB4360@elte.hu>
Date:	Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:17:40 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	andreas.herrmann3@....com, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3 0/5] x86, cacheinfo, amd: L3 Cache Index Disable fixes


* Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com> wrote:

> Hi Ingo,
> 
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 05:32:23PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > Well, if there's a crasher in there, then a minimal fix to address just that 
> > > is preferred for .33 - and that can be tagged for -stable immediately.
> > 
> > As I said earlier, I don't believe we have machines in the wild to
> > practically support the feature yet so we should be OK without a fix.
> > Let me verify that next week and get back to you with a minimal fix in
> > case we have any affected configurations.
> 
> I could verify that we don't need a minimal fix for .33 for the reason above 
> so the 5 fixes for .34 merge window should suffice completely.

Great - thanks for confirming that.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/