[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100127172546.42e09e1f@hyperion.delvare>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:25:46 +0100
From: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <kernel@...23.retrosnub.co.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, giometti@...ux.it
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] als: tsl2550: Remove spurious check against a
maximum lux value.
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:53:19 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>
Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
> ---
>
> As Jean Delvare observed, this check is ineffective so lets clear it out whilst
> we are working on this driver.
>
> drivers/als/tsl2550.c | 5 +----
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/als/tsl2550.c b/drivers/als/tsl2550.c
> index b911e9c..27745a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/als/tsl2550.c
> +++ b/drivers/als/tsl2550.c
> @@ -116,8 +116,6 @@ static int tsl2550_get_adc_value(struct i2c_client *client, u8 cmd)
> * of infrared level and visible light levels.
> */
>
> -#define TSL2550_MAX_LUX 1846
> -
> static const u8 ratio_lut[] = {
> 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100,
> 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 99, 99,
> @@ -187,8 +185,7 @@ static int tsl2550_calculate_lux(u8 ch0, u8 ch1)
> else
> return -EAGAIN;
>
> - /* LUX range check */
> - return lux > TSL2550_MAX_LUX ? TSL2550_MAX_LUX : lux;
> + return lux;
> }
>
> /*
--
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists