[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B60A54D.5060006@caviumnetworks.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:42:53 -0800
From: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
To: Joel Schopp <jschopp@...tin.ibm.com>
CC: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, apw@...onical.com,
davej@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch.pl: remove the 80 charactes punch card limit
Joel Schopp wrote:
>
>>>
>>>
>>> While the origins of 80 character lines dates back to punchcards
>>> there is a reason it has survived the test of time.
>>
>> Has it though? If that were the undisputed truth, we wouldn't be
>> having this discussion.
>
> If you know of a usability study that quantifies the effect of line
> length on readibility of C code I'm willing to listen, and I'm sure
> others are too.
Good point. As with most things related to kernel development, a
usability study or other market research from a reputable institution is
a vital first step before taking any action.
We don't have any good peer reviewed research on the subject that I am
aware of. I guess even contemplating a change at this early point would
be rash and dangerous.
I withdraw my previous comments with respect to the 80 Column Question.
Instead I would recommend elevating the WARNING to ERROR status.
David Daney
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists