[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100127230958.GE29665@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:09:58 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: adharmap@...eaurora.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@....fi>, Jean Pihet <jpihet@...sta.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
Colin Tuckley <colin.tuckley@....com>,
Philby John <pjohn@...mvista.com>,
Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@...ricsson.com>,
Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...pv.it>,
Andrea Gallo <andrea.gallo@...ricsson.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] gic: Add set_type callback
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:32:27AM -0800, adharmap@...eaurora.org wrote:
> + if (irq > 1020)
> + return -1;
*unprintable*. Always use proper error codes.
> +
> + /*
> + * Two bits each, calc the register and bit, 16 per 32 bit register
> + * accessible long word only
> + * But the field is NxN 1xN and rising/falling
> + */
> + register_index = (irq/16)<<2;
> + bit_index = (irq & 0xF)<<1;
> +
> + spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
> + reg_value = readl(gic_dist_base(irq) + GIC_DIST_CONFIG +
> + register_index);
> + /*
> + * keep the nxn and 1xn , mask the edge level
> + * Edge is 1, level 0
> + */
> + reg_value = (reg_value & ~(2<<bit_index));
> + if (flow_type & (IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING|IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING)) {
> + reg_value |= (2<<bit_index);
> + writel(reg_value, gic_dist_base(irq) + GIC_DIST_CONFIG
> + + register_index);
> + __set_irq_handler_unlocked(irq, handle_edge_irq);
> + }
> +
> + if (flow_type & (IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH|IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)) {
> + writel(reg_value, gic_dist_base(irq) + GIC_DIST_CONFIG
> + + register_index);
> + __set_irq_handler_unlocked(irq, handle_level_irq);
> + }
This needs to exclude the first 32 interrupts, where the interrupt
configuration is either read-only or banked between multiprocessor
CPUs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists