[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100126165050.6ab7977b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:50:50 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, stable@...nel.org,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] devmem and readahead fixes for 2.6.33
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:31:57 -0800
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:59:14PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > Andrew,
> >
> > Here are some good fixes for 2.6.33, they have been floating around
> > with other patches for some time. I should really seperate them out
> > earlier..
> >
> > Greg,
> >
> > The first two patches are on devmem. 2.6.32 also needs fixing, however
> > the patches can only apply cleanly to 2.6.33. I can do backporting if
> > necessary.
> >
> > [PATCH 1/4] devmem: check vmalloc address on kmem read/write
> > [PATCH 2/4] devmem: fix kmem write bug on memory holes
>
> After these hit Linus's tree, please send the backport to
> stable@...nel.org and I will be glad to queue them up.
>
I tagged the first two patches for -stable and shall send them in for 2.6.33.
The second two patches aren't quite as obvious - perhaps a risk of
weird regressions. So I'm thinking I'll send them in for 2.6.34-rc1
and I tagged them as "[2.6.33.x]" for -stable, so you can feed them
into 2.6.33.x once 2.6.34-rcX has had a bit of testing time, OK?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists