[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100128231750.1dd29044.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:17:50 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next:als tree build failure
Hi Jonathan, Jean,
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:59:37 +0000 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk> wrote:
>
> It does make sense to keep these two steps separate. Ah well, I guess any
> work around would be a pretty terrible cludge. I'll roll these two patches
> back together and otherwise we will end up with something even less coherent.
OK, thanks guys.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists