[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100128134518.26b762ed@hyperion.delvare>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:45:18 +0100
From: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next:als tree build failure
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:33:22 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 01/28/10 12:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Jonathan, Jean,
> >
> > On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:59:37 +0000 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >> It does make sense to keep these two steps separate. Ah well, I guess any
> >> work around would be a pretty terrible cludge. I'll roll these two patches
> >> back together and otherwise we will end up with something even less coherent.
> >
> > OK, thanks guys.
> >
> Everything should now be fixed in the als tree. New version of the move commit
> cleans out the i2c/chips directory and changes the i2c/Makefile and i2c/Kconfig
> appropriately. Only remaining related elements are the debug Kconfig option for
> i2c/chips but that can definitely go through the i2c tree rather than als (if there
> are no other users) and shouldn't break any builds.
I'll take care of the debug option later, no problem.
--
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists