linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] sched: cpuacct: Use bigger percpu counter batch values for stats counters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100128125202.GG2996@kryten>
Date:	Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:52:02 +1100
From:	Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
	hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	mingo@...e.hu, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] sched: cpuacct: Use bigger percpu counter batch values
 for stats counters


When CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING and CONFIG_CGROUP_CPUACCT are enabled we can
call cpuacct_update_stats with values much larger than percpu_counter_batch.
This means the call to percpu_counter_add will always add to the global count
which is protected by a spinlock and we end up with a global spinlock in
the scheduler.

Based on an idea by KOSAKI Motohiro, this patch scales the batch value by
cputime_one_jiffy such that we have the same batch limit as we would
if CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING was disabled. His patch did this once at boot
but that initialisation happened too early on PowerPC (before time_init)
and it was never updated at runtime as a result of a hotplug cpu add/remove.

This patch instead scales percpu_counter_batch by cputime_one_jiffy at
runtime, which keeps the batch correct even after cpu hotplug operations.
We cap it at INT_MAX in case of overflow.

For architectures that do not support CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING,
cputime_one_jiffy is the constant 1 and gcc is smart enough to
optimise min(s32 percpu_counter_batch, INT_MAX) to just percpu_counter_batch
at least on x86 and PowerPC. So there is no need to add an #ifdef.

On a 64 thread PowerPC box with CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING and 
CONFIG_CGROUP_CPUACCT enabled, a context switch microbenchmark is 234x faster
and almost matches a CONFIG_CGROUP_CPUACCT disabled kernel:

CONFIG_CGROUP_CPUACCT disabled:         16906698 ctx switches/sec
CONFIG_CGROUP_CPUACCT enabled:             61720 ctx switches/sec
CONFIG_CGROUP_CPUACCT + patch:          16663217 ctx switches/sec

Tested with:

wget http://ozlabs.org/~anton/junkcode/context_switch.c
make context_switch
for i in `seq 0 63`; do taskset -c $i ./context_switch & done
vmstat 1

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
---

v2: Added a comment and fixed the UP build.

Index: linux-cpumask/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-cpumask.orig/kernel/sched.c	2010-01-22 18:23:43.377212514 +1100
+++ linux-cpumask/kernel/sched.c	2010-01-28 23:24:02.677233753 +1100
@@ -10885,12 +10885,30 @@ static void cpuacct_charge(struct task_s
 }
 
 /*
+ * When CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING is enabled one jiffy can be very large
+ * in cputime_t units. As a result, cpuacct_update_stats calls
+ * percpu_counter_add with values large enough to always overflow the
+ * per cpu batch limit causing bad SMP scalability.
+ *
+ * To fix this we scale percpu_counter_batch by cputime_one_jiffy so we
+ * batch the same amount of time with CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING disabled
+ * and enabled. We cap it at INT_MAX which is the largest allowed batch value.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+#define CPUACCT_BATCH	\
+	min_t(long, percpu_counter_batch * cputime_one_jiffy, INT_MAX)
+#else
+#define CPUACCT_BATCH	0
+#endif
+
+/*
  * Charge the system/user time to the task's accounting group.
  */
 static void cpuacct_update_stats(struct task_struct *tsk,
 		enum cpuacct_stat_index idx, cputime_t val)
 {
 	struct cpuacct *ca;
+	int batch = CPUACCT_BATCH;
 
 	if (unlikely(!cpuacct_subsys.active))
 		return;
@@ -10899,7 +10917,7 @@ static void cpuacct_update_stats(struct 
 	ca = task_ca(tsk);
 
 	do {
-		percpu_counter_add(&ca->cpustat[idx], val);
+		__percpu_counter_add(&ca->cpustat[idx], val, batch);
 		ca = ca->parent;
 	} while (ca);
 	rcu_read_unlock();
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/