[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100128215430.GG18683@nowhere>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:54:32 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
mingo@...e.hu, "K.Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86,hw_breakpoint,kgdb: kgdb to usehw_breakpointAPI
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 02:23:13PM -0600, Jason Wessel wrote:
> Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 01:58:26PM -0600, Jason Wessel wrote:
> >
> >> New version which loses the call back registration, because if we
> >> register as a different breakpoint type, perf won't reject it.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > I don't understand what you mean here.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> This was the change:
>
> - attr.bp_type = HW_BREAKPOINT_X;
> + attr.bp_type = HW_BREAKPOINT_W;
>
> The perf API had extra constraint checks when you did not have a call
> back function and the type was HW_BREAKPOINT_X. Using the
> HW_BREAKPOINT_W type avoids the extra checks that would not allow me to
> register without providing a call back.
Oh, where have you seen this?
> > Ok. Well, let's go for it, as it's a regression that
> > needs to be fixed anyway.
> >
> > But we'll need to sanitize various things after that :)
> >
>
>
> Agreed.
>
> Can I take that to mean you have acked this version of the patch?
>
> Thanks,
> Jason.
Yep, please add my ack.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists