[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B6133DF.9080207@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:51:11 +0900
From: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>
To: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] perf lock: New subcommand "perf lock", for analyzing
lock statistics
On 2010年01月22日 22:39, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
Hi Ingo,
I have a trivial but difficult problem on this 11th patch.
> +static void
> +process_lock_acquire_event(void *data,
> + struct event *event __used,
> + int cpu __used,
> + u64 timestamp __used,
> + struct thread *thread __used)
> +{
> + struct trace_acquire_event acquire_event;
> + u64 tmp; /* this is required for casting... */
> +
> + tmp = raw_field_value(event, "lockdep_addr", data);
> + acquire_event.addr = (void *)tmp; # <- type of addr is void *
In the above function,
the statement:
raw_field_value(event, "lockdep_addr", data);
reads member of event which is type of void *.
But, direct assigning like
acquire_event.addr = (void *)raw_field_value(event, "lockdep_addr",
data);
produces warning and it is treated as error on build environment of perf.
GCC says "cast from function call of type ‘long long unsigned int’ to
non-matching type ‘void *’".
# Why is tmp to acquire_event.addr allowed? It's mysterious...
So I declared "u64 tmp" as temporary place for casting.
But next, this tmp causes compile error on x86_32.
Because it is u64. tmp should be u32 on x86_32.
I have to switch type of tmp u64 or u32 based on environment.
Don't you know some good preprocessor flag or some other avoiding methods?
I seeked but not found...
Thanks,
Hitoshi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists