[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d3f23371001272313i62fc9158se4cd9173f196fb12@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:13:00 +1000
From: John Williams <john.williams@...alogix.com>
To: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>, w.sang@...gutronix.de,
magnus.damm@...il.com, hjk@...utronix.de, gregkh@...e.de,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: UIO / of_genirq driver
Hi,
I came across this thread/patchset from around June last year:
http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-June/073086.html
where Wolfgang proposed a generic OF-driven UIO driver. The
discussion seemed to stall after Grant Likely indicated he didn't like
the use of a linux-specific compatible binding in the device tree
(compatible="generic-uio").
I guess I have a couple of questions:
* did this patchset go anywhere? I've been using it here the last
few days and it works great.
and more generally:
* Is there a better way to handle the OF bindings for this sort of thing?
Grant's complaint seems to come up often - when you have generic
controllers in a system (SPI/I2C also spring to mind), we need a way
of signalling somehow to the kernel that each instance has a
particular usage intended.
However, the device-tree guys complain whenever anyone tries to encode
anything non-hardware related into the DTS itself.
I guess I'd like to just open up a discussion, see if there's been any
progress towards a general solution.
Thanks,
John
--
John Williams
PetaLogix - Linux Solutions for a Reconfigurable World
w: www.petalogix.com p: +61-7-30090663 f: +61-7-30090663
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists