| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <tip-1a6e21f791fe85b40a9ddbafe999ab8ccffc3f78@git.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:30:09 GMT
From: tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eranian@...gle.com, hpa@...or.com,
mingo@...hat.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:perf/core] perf_events, x86: Clean up hw_perf_*_all() implementation
Commit-ID: 1a6e21f791fe85b40a9ddbafe999ab8ccffc3f78
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/1a6e21f791fe85b40a9ddbafe999ab8ccffc3f78
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
AuthorDate: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:07:47 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:01:47 +0100
perf_events, x86: Clean up hw_perf_*_all() implementation
Put the recursion avoidance code in the generic hook instead of
replicating it in each implementation.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
LKML-Reference: <20100127221122.057507285@...llo.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 59 +++++++++-----------------------------
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index 951213a..cf10839 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -1099,15 +1099,8 @@ static int __hw_perf_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
static void p6_pmu_disable_all(void)
{
- struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
u64 val;
- if (!cpuc->enabled)
- return;
-
- cpuc->enabled = 0;
- barrier();
-
/* p6 only has one enable register */
rdmsrl(MSR_P6_EVNTSEL0, val);
val &= ~ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0_ENABLE;
@@ -1118,12 +1111,6 @@ static void intel_pmu_disable_all(void)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
- if (!cpuc->enabled)
- return;
-
- cpuc->enabled = 0;
- barrier();
-
wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 0);
if (test_bit(X86_PMC_IDX_FIXED_BTS, cpuc->active_mask))
@@ -1135,17 +1122,6 @@ static void amd_pmu_disable_all(void)
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
int idx;
- if (!cpuc->enabled)
- return;
-
- cpuc->enabled = 0;
- /*
- * ensure we write the disable before we start disabling the
- * events proper, so that amd_pmu_enable_event() does the
- * right thing.
- */
- barrier();
-
for (idx = 0; idx < x86_pmu.num_events; idx++) {
u64 val;
@@ -1166,23 +1142,20 @@ void hw_perf_disable(void)
if (!x86_pmu_initialized())
return;
- if (cpuc->enabled)
- cpuc->n_added = 0;
+ if (!cpuc->enabled)
+ return;
+
+ cpuc->n_added = 0;
+ cpuc->enabled = 0;
+ barrier();
x86_pmu.disable_all();
}
static void p6_pmu_enable_all(void)
{
- struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
unsigned long val;
- if (cpuc->enabled)
- return;
-
- cpuc->enabled = 1;
- barrier();
-
/* p6 only has one enable register */
rdmsrl(MSR_P6_EVNTSEL0, val);
val |= ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0_ENABLE;
@@ -1193,12 +1166,6 @@ static void intel_pmu_enable_all(void)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
- if (cpuc->enabled)
- return;
-
- cpuc->enabled = 1;
- barrier();
-
wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, x86_pmu.intel_ctrl);
if (test_bit(X86_PMC_IDX_FIXED_BTS, cpuc->active_mask)) {
@@ -1217,12 +1184,6 @@ static void amd_pmu_enable_all(void)
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
int idx;
- if (cpuc->enabled)
- return;
-
- cpuc->enabled = 1;
- barrier();
-
for (idx = 0; idx < x86_pmu.num_events; idx++) {
struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[idx];
u64 val;
@@ -1417,6 +1378,10 @@ void hw_perf_enable(void)
if (!x86_pmu_initialized())
return;
+
+ if (cpuc->enabled)
+ return;
+
if (cpuc->n_added) {
/*
* apply assignment obtained either from
@@ -1461,6 +1426,10 @@ void hw_perf_enable(void)
cpuc->n_added = 0;
perf_events_lapic_init();
}
+
+ cpuc->enabled = 1;
+ barrier();
+
x86_pmu.enable_all();
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists