linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/12] perf lock: New subcommand "perf lock", for analyzing lock statistics

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100129143403.GJ13771@kernel.dk>
Date:	Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:34:03 +0100
From:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To:	Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] perf lock: New subcommand "perf lock", for
	analyzing lock statistics

On Fri, Jan 22 2010, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> Adding new subcommand "perf lock" to perf.
> 
> I made this patch series on
> latest perf/core of tip (ef12a141306c90336a3a10d40213ecd98624d274),
> so please apply this series to perf/core.

[snip]

I wanted to give this a go today, since I think it's pretty nifty and a
lot better than using /proc/lock_stat. But it basically spirals the
system into death [1]. How big a system did you test this on?

[1] Got this: [  117.097918] hrtimer: interrupt took 35093901 ns

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/