[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1001291716520.10968@sister.anvils>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:27:56 +0000 (GMT)
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
cc: Mark Lord <kernel@...savvy.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.32.5 regression: page allocation failure. order:1,
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 08:56:20AM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
>
> > I'll leave it running for another day or so, and then perhaps revert
> > the one patch to see which of the two things (new kernel, or patch)
> > is responsible for the difference.
> >
>
> Thanks, I'd appreciate it. While I'm reasonably confident the problem is
> with MIGRATE_RESERVE not being free as intended and that the patch fixes
> it, I'd like more proof.
You're more confident about that than I am! It will be very satisfying
if my patch turns out to make the difference, but still surprising to me.
Thank you for taking the time on this, Mark: I too would appreciate it
if you could later determine whether it's new kernel or patch solving it.
>
> Hugh, can I get a signed-off-by on that patch please? I can improve the
> changelog if you like and send it to Andrew for merging if you like.
I was adjusting the changelog and about to send direct to Linus Cc stable
in a few minutes, since I'm guessing there might be a 33-rc6 today, which
would be a pity to miss.
Whatever my reluctance to assume it's the fix to Mark's problem (which I'm
not mentioning in the changelog), we are both sure it's a valid bugfix.
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists