linux-kernel - [RFC 0/2 PATCH] remove member rt_se from struct rt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2674af741001282256l3058d356p752b49c024c47e1c@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:56:55 +0800
From:	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	rusty <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: [RFC 0/2 PATCH] remove member rt_se from struct rt_rq

member rt_se of struct rt_rq is a duplicate of tg->rt_se[cpu].
So we can remove one of them. After checking CFS, I think
rt_rq->rt_se can be removed for some kinds of consistence.

Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>

Yong Zhang (2):
      sched: change usage of rt_rq->rt_se to rt_rq->tg->rt_se[cpu]
      sched: remove member rt_se from struct rt_rq

 kernel/sched.c    |    2 --
 kernel/sched_rt.c |   10 ++++++++--
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/