[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4B62A39D020000780002CA80@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 08:00:13 +0000
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...ell.com>
To: <mingo@...e.hu>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...p.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] x86: enlightenment for ticket spinlocks
With the pv-ops based spinlocks reportedly having measurable overhead
on native execution, and with them also not easily fit (at least) fully
virtualized Xen guests, this patch series introduces a replacement
mechanism based on alternative instruction patching, and then uses it
for fully virtualized Xen guests. While coded to be orthogonal to
pv-ops, it really isn't, and it shouldn't be difficult to make pv-ops guests
use this in place of pv-ops spin locks.
The only additional overhead this introduces for native execution is
the writing of the owning CPU in the lock acquire paths. If this is
considered a problem, even that code could be eliminated for native
execution (by further alternative instruction patching).
(1) base implementation
(2) Xen implementation
(3) [optional] eliminate on NOPs in unlock path (introduced in (1))
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
View attachment "linux-2.6.33-rc5-virt-spinlocks-xen.patch" of type "text/plain" (12621 bytes)
View attachment "linux-2.6.33-rc5-virt-spinlocks-base.patch" of type "text/plain" (17612 bytes)
View attachment "linux-2.6.33-rc5-virt-spinlocks-no-nop.patch" of type "text/plain" (5126 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists