linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/68] ide2libata

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201001301624.10174.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:24:10 +0100
From:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/68] ide2libata

On Saturday 30 January 2010 12:25:40 am Alan Cox wrote:

> So I think its an extremely useful exercise to figure out what subtle
> differences there are between the drivers. It's not then a trivial
> assumption that they can just be pasted over. The include stuff though is

Fully agreed, that is why a fair deal of review work went into making
sure that porting of a each driver to ide2libata doesn't cause functionality
changes.

> too ugly to merge even if its an excellent research project to identify
> the differences and quirks.

Well, looks acceptable to me when the alternative is a duplicated code
(though I don't insists on getting it merged anyway)..

--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/