[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100130204737.GF5675@nowhere>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 21:47:38 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 05/10] ftrace: Drop buffer check in function
profiler callbacks
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 02:17:29PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Drop the null check on hlist->hash. It is wasteful because
> > we don't register the tracer if the buffer allocation failed,
> > and the memory barrier in register_ftrace_graph() ensure it
> > is visible to the callbacks right away.
> >
>
> When it is on a cpu which is just came up, hlist->hash is not
> allocated either.
>
> See ftrace_profile_init().
>
> function_profile_call(), profile_graph_entry() and profile_graph_return()
> on a just online cpu are wasteful. I think we need call
> ftrace_profile_init_cpu()(if ftrace_profile_enabled=1) when CPU_UP_PREPARE.
May be yeah, or perhaps we should play with cpu_possible_mask()
instead of cpu_online. Whatever, the patch is also buggy for the reasons
given by Steve, I'm going to drop it until we have a sane implementation
of synchronize_preempted_tasks().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists