[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1264834704.2919.3.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 07:58:24 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
netfilter-devel <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: Re: debug: nt_conntrack and KVM crash
Le vendredi 29 janvier 2010 à 20:59 -0500, Jon Masters a écrit :
> On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 20:57 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
>
> > Ah so I should have realized before but I wasn't looking at valid values
> > for the range of the hashtable yet, nf_conntrack_htable_size is getting
> > wildly out of whack. It goes from:
> >
> > (gdb) print nf_conntrack_hash_rnd
> > $1 = 2688505299
> > (gdb) print nf_conntrack_htable_size
> > $2 = 16384
> >
> > nf_conntrack_events: 1
> > nf_conntrack_max: 65536
> >
> > Shortly after booting, before being NULLed shortly after starting some
> > virtual machines (the hash isn't reset, whereas it is recomputed if the
> > hashtable is re-initialized after an intentional resizing operation):
>
> I mean the *seed* isn't changed, so I don't think it was resized
> intentionally. I wonder where else htable_size is fiddled with.
>
> Jon.
>
>
This rings a bell here, since another crash analysis on another problem
suggested to me a potential problem with read_mostly and modules, but I
had no time to confirm the thing yet.
Could you try changing
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:57:unsigned int nf_conntrack_htable_size __read_mostly;
to
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:57:unsigned int nf_conntrack_htable_size ;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists