[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1264841188.24455.54.camel@laptop>
Date:	Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:46:28 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Lock dependency based tree report in perf lock
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 00:17 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 
> 
> Anyway, that's just an idea, not trivial I must admit.
lockdep actually collects all this information, so writing it out isn't
too hard.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
