[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B6447EC.7030702@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:53:32 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...IV.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Slab Fragmentation Reduction V15
On 01/30/2010 05:48 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 02:49:31PM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>> 1. Establish a reference to an dentry/inode so that it is pinned.
>> Hopefully in a way that is not too expensive (i.e. no superblock
>> lock)
>>
>> 2. A means to free a dentry/inode objects from the VM reclaim context.
>
>
> Al, do you have a suggestions on a good way to do that?
You cannot free inode objects for files that are open, mmapped, etc.
> I guess the problem could be simplified by ignoring dentries in "unusual"
> states?
You mean dentries that are in use? :)
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists