[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100131205254.407214951@polymtl.ca>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 15:52:54 -0500
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, josh@...htriplett.org, dvhltc@...ibm.com,
niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com
Subject: [patch 0/3] introduce sys_membarrier(): process-wide memory barrier (v8)
Hi,
Here is an updated version of the sys_membarrier system call. It implements a
system call that allows userspace to distribute the overhead of memory barriers
asymmetrically. It is particularly useful for Userspace RCU (liburcu), to allow
the RCU read-side to only issue compiler barriers, matched by calls to
sys_membarrier() in the userspace synchronize_rcu().
Even though sys_membarrier should be portable to other architecture as-is
without arch-specific modifications, I propose to incrementally reserve the
system call IDs as we test it on each architecture.
Here is a version that I think should be ready for merging. It is based on the
2.6.33-rc6 kernel. I would appreciate if people who gave their Acked-by in the
RFC rounds could confirm their Acked-by following the patch set updates.
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists