[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201001310520.55813.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 05:20:55 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: John Kacur <jkacur@...il.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...oscopio.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] input: remove BKL from uinput open function
On Sunday 31 January 2010, John Kacur wrote:
> > Sorry, I should have been clearer, but not implementing llseek
> > is the problem I was referring to: When a driver has no explicit
> > .llseek operation in its file operations and does not call
> > nonseekable_open from its open operation, the VFS layer will
> > implicitly use default_llseek, which takes the BKL. We're
> > in the process of changing drivers not to do this, one by one
> > so we can kill the BKL in the end.
> >
>
> I know we've discussed this before, but why wouldn't the following
> make more sense?
> .llseek = no_llseek,
That's one of the possible solutions. Assigning it to generic_file_llseek
also gets rid of the BKL but keeps the current behaviour (calling seek
returns success without having an effect, no_llseek returns -ESPIPE),
while calling nonseekable_open has the other side-effect of making
pread/pwrite fail with -ESPIPE, which is more consistent than
only failing seek.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists