[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100131003449.GA11935@del.dom.local>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 01:34:49 +0100
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: Michael Breuer <mbreuer@...jas.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
flyboy@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>,
Don Fry <pcnet32@...izon.net>,
Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
Matt Carlson <mcarlson@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sky2: receive dma mapping error handling
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 11:31:48AM -0500, Michael Breuer wrote:
> On 01/28/2010 06:36 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >Please try this patch (and only this patch), on 2.6.33-rc5[*];
> >none of the other patches that did not make it upstream because that
> >confuses things too much.
> >
> >The code that checks for DMA mapping errors on receive buffers would
> >not handle errors correctly. I doubt you have these errors, but if you
> >did then it would explain the problems. The code has to be a little
> >tricky and build mapping for new rx buffer before releasing old one,
> >that way if new mapping fails, the old one can be reused.
> >
> >If it works for you, I will resubmit with signed-off.
> >
> >-
> >
> Nope - tx crash again. This time the system stayed up (but hosed)
> for a few hours. When I tried to recover eth0 the system then
> crashed.
>
> Brief summary of events (log extract below):
>
> System start Jan 28 19:29
> Everything seemed good (load and all) until 17:13:11 the following
> day when I got rx errors:
>
> Jan 29 17:13:11 mail kernel: sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x6230010
> length 1518
> Jan 29 17:13:11 mail kernel: sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x7f40010
> length 1518
These are length errors, but status shows more than 1518, e.g. 2036
here, unless I miss something. Please, don't use jumbo frames in your
network until we fully debug it for regular frames (Stephen admitted
sky2 jumbo might be broken).
...
> As I started looking at logs, the system hung and rebooted. I'm up
> now with dma debug enabled, however as with 2.6.32.4 num_entries is
> dropping and I don't think that dma debug will remain enabled long
> enough to catch a crash.
Could you try the patch below to show maybe some other users of
dma-debug entries?
Jarek P.
---
lib/dma-debug.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/dma-debug.c b/lib/dma-debug.c
index 7d2f0b3..e2dcc9c 100644
--- a/lib/dma-debug.c
+++ b/lib/dma-debug.c
@@ -310,6 +310,53 @@ static void hash_bucket_del(struct dma_debug_entry *entry)
list_del(&entry->list);
}
+struct dma_debug_dev {
+ struct device *dev;
+ unsigned int cnt;
+};
+
+#define DMA_DEBUG_DEVS 100
+static struct dma_debug_dev dma_debug_devs[DMA_DEBUG_DEVS];
+
+static void debug_dma_dump_devs(void)
+{
+ int idx, i;
+
+ memset(dma_debug_devs, 0, sizeof(struct dma_debug_dev) * DMA_DEBUG_DEVS);
+
+ for (idx = 0; idx < HASH_SIZE; idx++) {
+ struct hash_bucket *bucket = &dma_entry_hash[idx];
+ struct dma_debug_entry *entry;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&bucket->lock, flags);
+
+ list_for_each_entry(entry, &bucket->list, list) {
+ for (i = 0; i < DMA_DEBUG_DEVS; i++) {
+ struct device *dev = dma_debug_devs[i].dev;
+
+ if (!dev || dev == entry->dev) {
+ dma_debug_devs[i].dev = entry->dev;
+ dma_debug_devs[i].cnt++;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bucket->lock, flags);
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < DMA_DEBUG_DEVS; i++) {
+ struct device *dev = dma_debug_devs[i].dev;
+
+ if (!dev)
+ break;
+
+ pr_info("DMA-API: %s: entries: %d\n", dev_name(dev),
+ dma_debug_devs[i].cnt);
+ }
+}
+
/*
* Dump mapping entries for debugging purposes
*/
@@ -363,8 +410,11 @@ static struct dma_debug_entry *__dma_entry_alloc(void)
memset(entry, 0, sizeof(*entry));
num_free_entries -= 1;
- if (num_free_entries < min_free_entries)
+ if (num_free_entries < min_free_entries) {
min_free_entries = num_free_entries;
+ if ((min_free_entries & 0xffff) == 0)
+ debug_dma_dump_devs();
+ }
return entry;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists