[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1001311616590.5897@sister.anvils>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 16:25:22 +0000 (GMT)
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
To: Tony Perkins <da.perk@...il.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: Bug in find_vma_prev - mmap.c
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [Adding CCs]
>
> On Saturday 30 January 2010, Tony Perkins wrote:
> > This code returns vma (mm->mmap) if it sees that addr is lower than first VMA.
> > However, I think it falsely returns vma (mm->mmap) on the case where
> > addr is in the first VMA.
> >
> > If it is the first VMA region:
> > - *pprev should be set to NULL
> > - implying prev is NULL
> > - and should therefore return vma (so in this case, I just added if
> > it's the first VMA and it's within range)
> >
> > /* Same as find_vma, but also return a pointer to the previous VMA in *pprev. */
> > struct vm_area_struct *
> > find_vma_prev(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> > struct vm_area_struct **pprev)
> > {
> > struct vm_area_struct *vma = NULL, *prev = NULL;
> > struct rb_node *rb_node;
> > if (!mm)
> > goto out;
> >
> > /* Guard against addr being lower than the first VMA */
> > vma = mm->mmap;
> >
> > /* Go through the RB tree quickly. */
> > rb_node = mm->mm_rb.rb_node;
> >
> > while (rb_node) {
> > struct vm_area_struct *vma_tmp;
> > vma_tmp = rb_entry(rb_node, struct vm_area_struct, vm_rb);
> >
> > if (addr < vma_tmp->vm_end) {
> > // TONY: if (vma_tmp->vm_start <= addr) vma = vma_tmp; //
> > this returns the correct 'vma' when vma is the first node (i.e., no
> > prev)
> > rb_node = rb_node->rb_left;
> > } else {
> > prev = vma_tmp;
> > if (!prev->vm_next || (addr < prev->vm_next->vm_end))
> > break;
> > rb_node = rb_node->rb_right;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > out:
> > *pprev = prev;
> > return prev ? prev->vm_next : vma;
> > }
> >
> > Is this a known issue and/or has this problem been addressed?
> > Also, please CC my email address with responses.
>
> Well, I guess you should let the mm people know (CCs added).
Sorry, I don't see what the problem is: I may be misunderstanding.
Why do you think it is wrong to return the vma which addr is in
(whether or not that's the first vma)?
find_vma_prev() is supposed to return the same vma as find_vma()
does, but additionally fill in *pprev. And find_vma() is supposed
to return the vma containing or the next vma above the addr supplied.
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists