| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <tip-d6ad3e286d2c075a60b9f11075a2c55aeeeca2ad@git.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 07:27:38 GMT
From: tip-bot for Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
jason.wessel@...driver.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu,
Dongdong.Deng@...driver.com
Subject: [tip:core/urgent] softlockup: Add sched_clock_tick() to avoid kernel warning on kgdb resume
Commit-ID: d6ad3e286d2c075a60b9f11075a2c55aeeeca2ad
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/d6ad3e286d2c075a60b9f11075a2c55aeeeca2ad
Author: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:25:22 -0600
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 08:22:32 +0100
softlockup: Add sched_clock_tick() to avoid kernel warning on kgdb resume
When CONFIG_HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK is set, sched_clock() gets
the time from hardware such as the TSC on x86. In this
configuration kgdb will report a softlock warning message on
resuming or detaching from a debug session.
Sequence of events in the problem case:
1) "cpu sched clock" and "hardware time" are at 100 sec prior
to a call to kgdb_handle_exception()
2) Debugger waits in kgdb_handle_exception() for 80 sec and on
exit the following is called ... touch_softlockup_watchdog() -->
__raw_get_cpu_var(touch_timestamp) = 0;
3) "cpu sched clock" = 100s (it was not updated, because the
interrupt was disabled in kgdb) but the "hardware time" = 180 sec
4) The first timer interrupt after resuming from
kgdb_handle_exception updates the watchdog from the "cpu sched clock"
update_process_times() { ... run_local_timers() -->
softlockup_tick() --> check (touch_timestamp == 0) (it is "YES"
here, we have set "touch_timestamp = 0" at kgdb) -->
__touch_softlockup_watchdog() ***(A)--> reset "touch_timestamp"
to "get_timestamp()" (Here, the "touch_timestamp" will still be
set to 100s.) ...
scheduler_tick() ***(B)--> sched_clock_tick() (update "cpu sched
clock" to "hardware time" = 180s) ... }
5) The Second timer interrupt handler appears to have a large
jump and trips the softlockup warning.
update_process_times() { ... run_local_timers() -->
softlockup_tick() --> "cpu sched clock" - "touch_timestamp" =
180s-100s > 60s --> printk "soft lockup error messages" ... }
note: ***(A) reset "touch_timestamp" to
"get_timestamp(this_cpu)"
Why is "touch_timestamp" 100 sec, instead of 180 sec?
When CONFIG_HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK is set, the call trace of
get_timestamp() is:
get_timestamp(this_cpu)
-->cpu_clock(this_cpu)
-->sched_clock_cpu(this_cpu)
-->__update_sched_clock(sched_clock_data, now)
The __update_sched_clock() function uses the GTOD tick value to
create a window to normalize the "now" values. So if "now"
value is too big for sched_clock_data, it will be ignored.
The fix is to invoke sched_clock_tick() to update "cpu sched
clock" in order to recover from this state. This is done by
introducing the function touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync(). This
allows kgdb to request that the sched clock is updated when the
watchdog thread runs the first time after a resume from kgdb.
[yong.zhang0@...il.com: Use per cpu instead of an array]
Signed-off-by: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongdong Deng <Dongdong.Deng@...driver.com>
Cc: kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc: peterz@...radead.org
LKML-Reference: <1264631124-4837-2-git-send-email-jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 4 ++++
kernel/kgdb.c | 6 +++---
kernel/softlockup.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 6f7bba9..8923215 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -310,6 +310,7 @@ extern void sched_show_task(struct task_struct *p);
#ifdef CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP
extern void softlockup_tick(void);
extern void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void);
+extern void touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync(void);
extern void touch_all_softlockup_watchdogs(void);
extern int proc_dosoftlockup_thresh(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
void __user *buffer,
@@ -323,6 +324,9 @@ static inline void softlockup_tick(void)
static inline void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void)
{
}
+static inline void touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync(void)
+{
+}
static inline void touch_all_softlockup_watchdogs(void)
{
}
diff --git a/kernel/kgdb.c b/kernel/kgdb.c
index 2eb517e..87f2cc5 100644
--- a/kernel/kgdb.c
+++ b/kernel/kgdb.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ static void kgdb_wait(struct pt_regs *regs)
/* Signal the primary CPU that we are done: */
atomic_set(&cpu_in_kgdb[cpu], 0);
- touch_softlockup_watchdog();
+ touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync();
clocksource_touch_watchdog();
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
@@ -1450,7 +1450,7 @@ acquirelock:
(kgdb_info[cpu].task &&
kgdb_info[cpu].task->pid != kgdb_sstep_pid) && --sstep_tries) {
atomic_set(&kgdb_active, -1);
- touch_softlockup_watchdog();
+ touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync();
clocksource_touch_watchdog();
local_irq_restore(flags);
@@ -1550,7 +1550,7 @@ kgdb_restore:
}
/* Free kgdb_active */
atomic_set(&kgdb_active, -1);
- touch_softlockup_watchdog();
+ touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync();
clocksource_touch_watchdog();
local_irq_restore(flags);
diff --git a/kernel/softlockup.c b/kernel/softlockup.c
index d225790..0d4c789 100644
--- a/kernel/softlockup.c
+++ b/kernel/softlockup.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(print_lock);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, softlockup_touch_ts); /* touch timestamp */
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, softlockup_print_ts); /* print timestamp */
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct task_struct *, softlockup_watchdog);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, softlock_touch_sync);
static int __read_mostly did_panic;
int __read_mostly softlockup_thresh = 60;
@@ -79,6 +80,12 @@ void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(touch_softlockup_watchdog);
+void touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync(void)
+{
+ __raw_get_cpu_var(softlock_touch_sync) = true;
+ __raw_get_cpu_var(softlockup_touch_ts) = 0;
+}
+
void touch_all_softlockup_watchdogs(void)
{
int cpu;
@@ -118,6 +125,14 @@ void softlockup_tick(void)
}
if (touch_ts == 0) {
+ if (unlikely(per_cpu(softlock_touch_sync, this_cpu))) {
+ /*
+ * If the time stamp was touched atomically
+ * make sure the scheduler tick is up to date.
+ */
+ per_cpu(softlock_touch_sync, this_cpu) = false;
+ sched_clock_tick();
+ }
__touch_softlockup_watchdog();
return;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists