lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:04:07 +0100 From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> Subject: Re: [Bug #15192] netperf ~50% regression with 2.6.33-rc1, bisect to 1b9508f On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 01:22 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). Yes, it should remain open. We're currently waiting for some data from Lin Ming. The regression itself isn't making much sense.. a kernel with NEWIDLE disabled should show the same performance, but does not. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists