linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/68] ide2libata

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100201110723.54870f7f@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:07:23 +0000
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	jeff@...zik.org, bzolnier@...il.com, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/68] ide2libata

> The cost and risk is testing the morphing changes, but I think the
> scales tip towards making this truly worth it.

The cost and risk is taking two stable and quite maintainable stacks and
turning them into one unmaintainable broken one..

I'm a little surprised that the old IDE layer which was supposed to be
maintenance only is getting this treatment - except for the research
value of seeing what the differences are in the drivers.

I'm amazed that you'd suggest trashing the current ATA stack to make the
maintenance of the old ones easier - which aren't supposed to be in flux
in the first place.

Alan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/