[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100201134739.GA4635@thunk.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 08:47:39 -0500
From: tytso@....edu
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Alexander Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: inodes: Support generic defragmentation
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 11:17:02AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> On the other hand I would like to keep the option to be more aggressive
> for soft page offlining where it's useful and nobody cares about
> the cost.
I'm not sure I understand what the goals are for "soft page
offlining". Can you say a bit more about that?
> Or the "let's add a updatedb" hint approach has the problem that
> it won't cover a lot of other programs (as Linus always points out
> these new interfaces rarely actually get used)
Sure, but the number of programs that scan all of the files in a file
system and would need this sort of hint are actually pretty small.
Uptdatedb and backup programs are pretty much about it.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists