[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100201141646.GC16236@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:16:46 +0100
From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
CC: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 04/11 v2] VT-d: Change {un}map_range functions to implement
{un}map interface
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:05:26AM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > Um, that's not a page-size based interface. Page size isn't always 4KiB;
> > this code runs on IA64 too.
> >
> > We have enough fun with CPU vs. DMA page size on IA64 already :)
>
> Ah right. So this should be
>
> size = PAGE_SIZE << gfp_order;
>
> Right? The interface is meant to map the same amount of memory which
> alloc_pages(gfp_order) would return. Same for the return value of the
> unmap function.
Ok, here is an updated patch (also updated in the iommu/largepage
branch). Does it look ok to you David?
>From a3ef8393d8027c795709e11b2f57c6013d2474a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:17:37 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 04/11] VT-d: Change {un}map_range functions to implement {un}map interface
This patch changes the iommu-api functions for mapping and
unmapping page ranges to use the new page-size based
interface. This allows to remove the range based functions
later.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
---
drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
index a714e3d..371dc56 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
@@ -3626,14 +3626,15 @@ static void intel_iommu_detach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
domain_remove_one_dev_info(dmar_domain, pdev);
}
-static int intel_iommu_map_range(struct iommu_domain *domain,
- unsigned long iova, phys_addr_t hpa,
- size_t size, int iommu_prot)
+static int intel_iommu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain,
+ unsigned long iova, phys_addr_t hpa,
+ int gfp_order, int iommu_prot)
{
struct dmar_domain *dmar_domain = domain->priv;
u64 max_addr;
int addr_width;
int prot = 0;
+ size_t size;
int ret;
if (iommu_prot & IOMMU_READ)
@@ -3643,6 +3644,7 @@ static int intel_iommu_map_range(struct iommu_domain *domain,
if ((iommu_prot & IOMMU_CACHE) && dmar_domain->iommu_snooping)
prot |= DMA_PTE_SNP;
+ size = PAGE_SIZE << gfp_order;
max_addr = iova + size;
if (dmar_domain->max_addr < max_addr) {
int min_agaw;
@@ -3669,19 +3671,19 @@ static int intel_iommu_map_range(struct iommu_domain *domain,
return ret;
}
-static void intel_iommu_unmap_range(struct iommu_domain *domain,
- unsigned long iova, size_t size)
+static int intel_iommu_unmap(struct iommu_domain *domain,
+ unsigned long iova, int gfp_order)
{
struct dmar_domain *dmar_domain = domain->priv;
-
- if (!size)
- return;
+ size_t size = PAGE_SIZE << gfp_order;
dma_pte_clear_range(dmar_domain, iova >> VTD_PAGE_SHIFT,
(iova + size - 1) >> VTD_PAGE_SHIFT);
if (dmar_domain->max_addr == iova + size)
dmar_domain->max_addr = iova;
+
+ return gfp_order;
}
static phys_addr_t intel_iommu_iova_to_phys(struct iommu_domain *domain,
@@ -3714,8 +3716,8 @@ static struct iommu_ops intel_iommu_ops = {
.domain_destroy = intel_iommu_domain_destroy,
.attach_dev = intel_iommu_attach_device,
.detach_dev = intel_iommu_detach_device,
- .map_range = intel_iommu_map_range,
- .unmap_range = intel_iommu_unmap_range,
+ .map = intel_iommu_map,
+ .unmap = intel_iommu_unmap,
.iova_to_phys = intel_iommu_iova_to_phys,
.domain_has_cap = intel_iommu_domain_has_cap,
};
--
1.6.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists