linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] netfilter: per netns nf_conntrack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 1 Feb 2010 16:58:49 +0200
From:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	netfilter-devel <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: per netns nf_conntrack_cachep

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> +       net->ct.nf_conntrack_cachep = kmem_cache_create("nf_conntrack",
> +                                                       sizeof(struct nf_conn), 0,
> +                                                       SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU, NULL);

Duplicate slab name detected.

Can we clarify this?

Is checking for ct->ct_net enough to avoid the bug
while maintaining per-netns/global status quo?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/