[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1265040000.6312.21.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:00:00 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, josh@...htriplett.org, dvhltc@...ibm.com,
niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] scheduler: add full memory barriers upon task
switch at runqueue lock/unlock
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 10:23 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 01:58 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > So I would prefer the simpler version that doesn't add overhead to
> > ctxsw, at least for the first implementation.
>
> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
> ;-)
Yup, fast path needs to _lose_ some weight.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists