lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:25:39 -0800 From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> To: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] bitops: rename for_each_bit to for_each_set_bit On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 00:10 +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote: > Rename for_each_bit to for_each_set_bit in the kernel source tree. I preferred the for_each_bit because it gives some naming consistency. These look for set bits: find_first_bit find_next_bit find_last_bit These look for unset bits: find_first_zero_bit find_next_zero_bit I think there should be 3 macros named: for_each_bit for_each_zero_bit for_every_bit and maybe there's a use for: find_last_zero_bit I think the macro definition should be located near these other functions in bitops.h and not placed somewhat randomly near the top of the file. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists