| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20100131143142.GA11186@localhost>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:31:42 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Chris Frost <frost@...ucla.edu>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steve Dickson <steved@...hat.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Xu Chenfeng <xcf@...c.edu.cn>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steve VanDeBogart <vandebo-lkml@...dbox.net>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/readahead.c: update the LRU positions of in-core
pages, too
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 09:32:17PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 03:36:35PM -0700, Chris Frost wrote:
> > I changed Wu's patch to add a PageLRU() guard that I believe is required
> > and optimized zone lock acquisition to only unlock and lock at zone changes.
> > This optimization seems to provide a 10-20% system time improvement for
> > some of my GIMP benchmarks and no improvement for other benchmarks.
>
> > + del_page_from_lru_list(zone, page, lru);
> > + add_page_to_lru_list(zone, page, lru);
> > + }
> > + put_page(page);
I feel very uncomfortable about this put_page() inside zone->lru_lock.
(might deadlock: put_page() conditionally takes zone->lru_lock again)
If you really want the optimization, can we do it like this?
Thanks,
Fengguang
---
readahead: retain inactive lru pages to be accessed soon
From: Chris Frost <frost@...ucla.edu>
Ensure that cached pages in the inactive list are not prematurely evicted;
move such pages to lru head when they are covered by
- in-kernel heuristic readahead
- an posix_fadvise(POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED) hint from an application
Before this patch, pages already in core may be evicted before the
pages covered by the same prefetch scan but that were not yet in core.
Many small read requests may be forced on the disk because of this behavior.
In particular, posix_fadvise(... POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED) on an in-core page
has no effect on the page's location in the LRU list, even if it is the
next victim on the inactive list.
This change helps address the performance problems we encountered
while modifying SQLite and the GIMP to use large file prefetching.
Overall these prefetching techniques improved the runtime of large
benchmarks by 10-17x for these applications. More in the publication
_Reducing Seek Overhead with Application-Directed Prefetching_ in
USENIX ATC 2009 and at http://libprefetch.cs.ucla.edu/.
Signed-off-by: Chris Frost <frost@...ucla.edu>
Signed-off-by: Steve VanDeBogart <vandebo@...ucla.edu>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
---
mm/readahead.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
--- linux.orig/mm/readahead.c 2010-01-31 21:39:24.000000000 +0800
+++ linux/mm/readahead.c 2010-01-31 22:20:24.000000000 +0800
@@ -9,7 +9,9 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
+#include <linux/memcontrol.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/mm_inline.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/blkdev.h>
#include <linux/backing-dev.h>
@@ -133,6 +135,48 @@ out:
}
/*
+ * The file range is expected to be accessed in near future. Move pages
+ * (possibly in inactive lru tail) to lru head, so that they are retained
+ * in memory for some reasonable time.
+ */
+static void retain_inactive_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
+ pgoff_t index, int len)
+{
+ struct page *grabbed_page;
+ struct page *page;
+ struct zone *zone;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
+ grabbed_page = page = find_get_page(mapping, index + i);
+ if (!page)
+ continue;
+
+ zone = page_zone(page);
+ spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
+ if (PageLRU(page) &&
+ !PageActive(page) &&
+ !PageUnevictable(page)) {
+ int lru = page_lru_base_type(page);
+
+ for (; i < len; i++) {
+ struct page *p = page;
+
+ if (page->mapping != mapping ||
+ page->index != index + i)
+ break;
+ page = list_to_page(&page->lru);
+ del_page_from_lru_list(zone, p, lru);
+ add_page_to_lru_list(zone, p, lru);
+ }
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
+ page_cache_release(grabbed_page);
+ cond_resched();
+ }
+}
+
+/*
* __do_page_cache_readahead() actually reads a chunk of disk. It allocates all
* the pages first, then submits them all for I/O. This avoids the very bad
* behaviour which would occur if page allocations are causing VM writeback.
@@ -184,6 +228,14 @@ __do_page_cache_readahead(struct address
}
/*
+ * Normally readahead will auto stop on cached segments, so we won't
+ * hit many cached pages. If it does happen, bring the inactive pages
+ * adjecent to the newly prefetched ones(if any).
+ */
+ if (ret < nr_to_read)
+ retain_inactive_pages(mapping, offset, page_idx);
+
+ /*
* Now start the IO. We ignore I/O errors - if the page is not
* uptodate then the caller will launch readpage again, and
* will then handle the error.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists