[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1002011152510.30861@router.home>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:53:52 -0600 (CST)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...IV.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Slab Fragmentation Reduction V15
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 01/30/2010 05:48 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 02:49:31PM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>
> > > 1. Establish a reference to an dentry/inode so that it is pinned.
> > > Hopefully in a way that is not too expensive (i.e. no
> > > superblock
> > > lock)
> > >
> > > 2. A means to free a dentry/inode objects from the VM reclaim context.
> >
> >
> > Al, do you have a suggestions on a good way to do that?
>
> You cannot free inode objects for files that are open, mmapped, etc.
Of course. Those objects need to prevent reclaim attempts.
> > I guess the problem could be simplified by ignoring dentries in "unusual"
> > states?
>
> You mean dentries that are in use? :)
The existing patch already tried to discern that and avoid the reclaim of
these.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists