[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B672DEE.8000804@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 11:39:26 -0800
From: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...glemail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>,
Dan Terpstra <terpstra@...s.utk.edu>,
Philip Mucci <mucci@...s.utk.edu>,
Maynard Johnson <mpjohn@...ibm.com>,
Carl Love <cel@...ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf_events: support for uncore a.k.a. nest units
On 1/30/2010 12:42 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 15:05 -0800, Corey Ashford wrote:
>> So you'd read the id from the sysfs topology tree, and then pass that id to the
>> interface? That's an interesting approach that eliminates the need to pass a
>> string pmu path to the kernel.
>
> No, the attr.pmu_id would reflect the location in the tree (pci
> location, or spu number), the pmu id reported would identify the kind of
> pmu driver used for that particular device.
>
> I realized this confusion after sending but didn't clarify, we should
> come up with a good alternative name for either (or both) uses.
>
Ok, just so I'm clear here, is attr.pmu_id a (char *) or some sort of encoded
bit field?
- Corey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists