[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1265053916.26421.1.camel@maxim-laptop>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:51:56 +0200
From: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/resume (was:
Re: [linux-pm] Memory allocations in .suspend became very unreliable)
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 22:37 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 19:47 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday 30 January 2010, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 01:38 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I thing the snippet below is a good summary of what this is about.
> > >
> > > Any progress on that?
> >
> > Well, I'm waiting for you to report back:
> > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/74740/
> >
> > The patch is appended once again for convenience.
>
> Ah, sorry!
>
> I used the second version (with the locks) and it works for sure (~500
> cycles)
>
> However, as I discovered today, it takes the lock also for GFP_ATOMIC,
> and thats why I see several backtraces in the kernel log. Anyway this
> isn't important.
>
> I forgot all about this patch, and I am compiling the kernel right away.
> Will put the kernel through the hibernate loop tonight.
I did 123 hibernate cycles on my notebook. Everything is fine.
This patch very very likely is working.
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists