linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] irda: remove BKL from irnet open function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100201203616.GJ1414@holoscopio.com>
Date:	Mon, 1 Feb 2010 18:36:17 -0200
From:	Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...oscopio.com>
To:	John Kacur <jkacur@...il.com>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Samuel Ortiz <samuel@...tiz.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irda: remove BKL from irnet open function

On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 09:32:30PM +0100, John Kacur wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
> <cascardo@...oscopio.com> wrote:
> > Commit cddf63d99d0d145f18b293c3d0de4af7dab2a922 has push down the BKL
> > into irnet open function. However, there's nothing that needs locking in
> > there.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...oscopio.com>
> > ---
> >  net/irda/irnet/irnet_ppp.c |    3 ---
> >  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/irda/irnet/irnet_ppp.c b/net/irda/irnet/irnet_ppp.c
> > index 156020d..d6b502c 100644
> > --- a/net/irda/irnet/irnet_ppp.c
> > +++ b/net/irda/irnet/irnet_ppp.c
> > @@ -479,7 +479,6 @@ dev_irnet_open(struct inode *       inode,
> >   ap = kzalloc(sizeof(*ap), GFP_KERNEL);
> >   DABORT(ap == NULL, -ENOMEM, FS_ERROR, "Can't allocate struct irnet...\n");
> >
> > -  lock_kernel();
> >   /* initialize the irnet structure */
> >   ap->file = file;
> >
> > @@ -501,7 +500,6 @@ dev_irnet_open(struct inode *       inode,
> >     {
> >       DERROR(FS_ERROR, "Can't setup IrDA link...\n");
> >       kfree(ap);
> > -      unlock_kernel();
> >       return err;
> >     }
> >
> > @@ -512,7 +510,6 @@ dev_irnet_open(struct inode *       inode,
> >   file->private_data = ap;
> >
> >   DEXIT(FS_TRACE, " - ap=0x%p\n", ap);
> > -  unlock_kernel();
> >   return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > --
> > 1.6.6.1
> 
> This is probably NOT safe to do, because the BKL is synchronizing the
> ioctl code.
> 
> Thanks

And is it possible that ioctl will be called before open returns? If it
is, then, yes, this is not safe. But I don't really believe the case. Or
is it?

Or is it only possible to happen with different struct file*? In that
case, open is only allocating and initializing the irnet_socket *ap.
Then, ioctl uses it. There is some race between the different ioctls,
but no race between open/ioctl for different opened devices. That is, a
process may open /dev/irnet while another process is issuing ioctls to
its own opened /dev/irnet.

Besides, dev_irnet_ioctl uses the file private_data to get to the
irnet_socket, which is the last thing the open call does. I assume doing
an attribution to a pointer is atomic in all architectures supported by
Linux currently, isn't it?

Regards,
Cascardo.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)