[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:50:30 +0000
From: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: sound tree build failure
Hi Stephen,
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 22:17 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:58:00 +0000 Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:37:32PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > > The sound tree is merged before the mfd tree, and the commit that adds
> > > those is only in the mfd tree. So the sound tree, on its own, is
> > > broken. This driver will only build if you merge the mfd tree as well.
> >
> > Ah, you're doing builds after each individual merge. It might help to
>
> Always have ...
>
I wonder if it would be possible to re-order the merge sequence so that
similar inter tree dependencies are less likely to cause -next build
failures in the future. I guess atm lots of driver trees can depend on
MFD (e.g. regulator, sound, rtc, backlight, led, watchdog, etc) so it
may be good to move it up the order.
Liam
--
Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd
ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer.
http://www.slimlogic.co.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists