[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100203092453.GA21921@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:24:53 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...onical.com>
Cc: List Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
valentin.longchamp@...l.ch, daniel@...aq.de,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, Dinh.Nguyen@...escale.com,
r.herring@...escale.com, bryan.wu@...onical.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 05/11] mxc: Core support for i.MX5 series of
processors from Freescale
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:16:27PM -0800, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> +static int _clk_pll_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
> +{
> + u32 reg;
> + void __iomem *pllbase;
> +
> + long mfi, pdf, mfn, mfd = 999999;
> + s64 temp64;
> + unsigned long quad_parent_rate;
> + unsigned long pll_hfsm, dp_ctl;
> + unsigned long parent_rate;
> +
> + parent_rate = clk_get_rate(clk->parent);
> +
> + pllbase = _get_pll_base(clk);
> +
> + quad_parent_rate = 4 * parent_rate;
> + pdf = mfi = -1;
> + while (++pdf < 16 && mfi < 5)
> + mfi = rate * (pdf+1) / quad_parent_rate;
> + if (mfi > 15)
> + return -1;
Why not "return -EPERM" since what you're actually saying here by
returning -1 is "Permission Denied"? If you didn't mean "Permission
Denied", then don't use return -1.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists