[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100203131911.GA25223@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 14:19:11 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: using O_LARGEFILE to open perf data file -
fix
* Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Setting _FILE_OFFSET_BITS and using O_LARGEFILE, lseek64, etc, is
> redundant. Thanks H. Peter Anvin for point out
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 3 +--
> tools/perf/util/header.c | 21 ++++++++++-----------
> tools/perf/util/session.c | 3 +--
> tools/perf/util/trace-event-read.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
i already applied the v1 patch - mind sending a delta patch that removes the
redundant definitions?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists