lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:22:26 +0000
From:	Richard Kennedy <richard@....demon.co.uk>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	penberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: [RFC] slub: ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN defaults to 8 on x86_32. is this
 too big?

Hi all,

slub.c sets the default value of ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN to sizeof(unsigned
long long) if the architecture didn't already override it.

And as x86_32 doesn't set a value this means that slab objects get
aligned to 8 bytes, potentially wasting 4 bytes per object. Slub forces
objects to be aligned to sizeof(void *) anyway, but I don't see that
there is any need for it to be 8 on 32bits.

I'm working on a patch to pack more buffer_heads into each kmem_cache
slab page.
On 32 bits the structure size is 52 bytes and with the alignment applied
I end up with a slab of 73 x 56 byte objects. However, if the minimum
alignment was sizeof(void *) then I'd get 78 x 52 byte objects. So there
is quite a memory saving to be had in changing this.

Can I define a ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN in x86_64 to sizeof(void *) ? 
or would it be ok to change the default in slub.c to sizeof(void *) ?

Or am I missing something ?

regards
Richard


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ