linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/11] [RFC] 512K readahead size with thrashing safe readahead

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100203155845.GB17059@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:58:45 -0500
From:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To:	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] [RFC] 512K readahead size with thrashing safe
	readahead

On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 10:24:54AM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 02:27:56PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > Vivek,
> > 
> > On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 06:38:03AM +0800, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:28:35PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > > Andrew,
> > > > 
> > > > This is to lift default readahead size to 512KB, which I believe yields
> > > > more I/O throughput without noticeably increasing I/O latency for today's HDD.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Hi Fengguang,
> > > 
> > > I was doing a quick test with the patches. I was using fio to run some
> > > sequential reader threads. I have got one access to one Lun from an HP
> > > EVA. In my case it looks like with the patches throughput has come down.
> > 
> > Thank you for the quick testing!
> > 
> > This patchset does 3 things:
> > 
> > 1) 512K readahead size
> > 2) new readahead algorithms
> > 3) new readahead tracing/stats interfaces
> > 
> > (1) will impact performance, while (2) _might_ impact performance in
> > case of bugs.
> > 
> > Would you kindly retest the patchset with readahead size manually set
> > to 128KB?  That would help identify the root cause of the performance
> > drop:
> > 
> >         DEV=sda
> >         echo 128 > /sys/block/$DEV/queue/read_ahead_kb
> > 
> 
> I have got two paths to the HP EVA and got multipath device setup(dm-3). I
> noticed with vanilla kernel read_ahead_kb=128 after boot but with your patches
> applied it is set to 4. So looks like something went wrong with device
> size/capacity detection hence wrong defaults. Manually setting
> read_ahead_kb=512, got me better performance as compare to vanilla kernel.
> 

I put a printk in add_disk and noticed that for multipath device get_capacity() is returning 0 and that's why ra_pages is being set to 1.

Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/