linux-kernel - Re: perf report for .ko files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 3 Feb 2010 15:28:31 -0200
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc:	john smith <whalajam@...oo.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: perf report for .ko files

Em Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 07:45:54AM +0100, Mike Galbraith escreveu:
> On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 17:15 -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> 
> > I actually never tried doing annotation with a module, will try.
> 
> Seems it went south again in both .git and .tip.  32 works.

We need to read the ELF header, notice its a relocatable file and not
apply the unmap_ip functions, doing a patch now.

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/