| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:42:59 -0600
From: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
To: Christoph Egger <siccegge@...d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sfrench@...ba.org,
jlayton@...hat.com, linux-cifs-client@...ts.samba.org,
vamos@...informatik.uni-erlangen.de
Subject: Re: Obsolete config in kernel source (CIFS_QUOTA)
Part of the delay in getting quotas implementation finished had been
lack of documentation (making it harder to figure out the network
interfaces) but that is no longer an issue, and part had been
understanding the xfs quota tools vs. how they work in (e.g.)
ext3/ext4 and other fs.
It may be better to take the quota code out of cifs as you suggest,
and do them (only) in smb2 till they stabilize (since we don't want to
risk breaking cifs for experimental features) but not sure it is worth
the trouble since quota support will probably turn out to be easier to
implement than we originally thought (although much lower priority
than some of what Jeff is working on for cifs, and much lower priority
than parallelizing the cifs write path - cifs_writepages, and smb2)
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Christoph Egger
<siccegge@...d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> As part of the VAMOS[0] research project at the University of
> Erlangen we're checking referential integrity between kernel KConfig
> options and in-code Conditional blocks.
>
> The CIFS Quota module seems to be a bit larger than the other
> unreachable code blocks I've come acros recently. Is the KConfig Item
> simply missing here? If not maybe the unreachable code should be
> removed from the kernel tree?
>
> Please keep me informed of this patch getting confirmed /
> merged so we can keep track of it.
>
> Regards
>
> Christoph Egger
>
> [0] http://vamos1.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/
>
> ----
> From 69f2e89897e197bea5984e4c2f98bdb6ec3f48b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Christoph Egger <siccegge@...d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
> Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 15:40:44 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Getting rid of CONFIG_CIFS_QUOTA
>
> CONFIG_CIFS_QUOTA has been a Zombi Feature for a really long time now
> and doesn't seem to be developed on. So this change gets rid of the
> unused Codepath.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Egger <siccegge@...d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
> ---
> fs/cifs/cifsfs.c | 107 ------------------------------------------------------
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> index 8c6a036..0135079 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> @@ -49,10 +49,6 @@
> #include "cifs_spnego.h"
> #define CIFS_MAGIC_NUMBER 0xFF534D42 /* the first four bytes of SMB PDUs */
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CIFS_QUOTA
> -static const struct quotactl_ops cifs_quotactl_ops;
> -#endif /* QUOTA */
> -
> int cifsFYI = 0;
> int cifsERROR = 1;
> int traceSMB = 0;
> @@ -138,9 +134,6 @@ cifs_read_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data,
> /* if (cifs_sb->tcon->ses->server->maxBuf > MAX_CIFS_HDR_SIZE + 512)
> sb->s_blocksize =
> cifs_sb->tcon->ses->server->maxBuf - MAX_CIFS_HDR_SIZE; */
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CIFS_QUOTA
> - sb->s_qcop = &cifs_quotactl_ops;
> -#endif
> sb->s_blocksize = CIFS_MAX_MSGSIZE;
> sb->s_blocksize_bits = 14; /* default 2**14 = CIFS_MAX_MSGSIZE */
> inode = cifs_root_iget(sb, ROOT_I);
> @@ -421,106 +414,6 @@ cifs_show_options(struct seq_file *s, struct vfsmount *m)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CIFS_QUOTA
> -int cifs_xquota_set(struct super_block *sb, int quota_type, qid_t qid,
> - struct fs_disk_quota *pdquota)
> -{
> - int xid;
> - int rc = 0;
> - struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(sb);
> - struct cifsTconInfo *pTcon;
> -
> - if (cifs_sb)
> - pTcon = cifs_sb->tcon;
> - else
> - return -EIO;
> -
> -
> - xid = GetXid();
> - if (pTcon) {
> - cFYI(1, ("set type: 0x%x id: %d", quota_type, qid));
> - } else
> - rc = -EIO;
> -
> - FreeXid(xid);
> - return rc;
> -}
> -
> -int cifs_xquota_get(struct super_block *sb, int quota_type, qid_t qid,
> - struct fs_disk_quota *pdquota)
> -{
> - int xid;
> - int rc = 0;
> - struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(sb);
> - struct cifsTconInfo *pTcon;
> -
> - if (cifs_sb)
> - pTcon = cifs_sb->tcon;
> - else
> - return -EIO;
> -
> - xid = GetXid();
> - if (pTcon) {
> - cFYI(1, ("set type: 0x%x id: %d", quota_type, qid));
> - } else
> - rc = -EIO;
> -
> - FreeXid(xid);
> - return rc;
> -}
> -
> -int cifs_xstate_set(struct super_block *sb, unsigned int flags, int operation)
> -{
> - int xid;
> - int rc = 0;
> - struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(sb);
> - struct cifsTconInfo *pTcon;
> -
> - if (cifs_sb)
> - pTcon = cifs_sb->tcon;
> - else
> - return -EIO;
> -
> - xid = GetXid();
> - if (pTcon) {
> - cFYI(1, ("flags: 0x%x operation: 0x%x", flags, operation));
> - } else
> - rc = -EIO;
> -
> - FreeXid(xid);
> - return rc;
> -}
> -
> -int cifs_xstate_get(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_quota_stat *qstats)
> -{
> - int xid;
> - int rc = 0;
> - struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(sb);
> - struct cifsTconInfo *pTcon;
> -
> - if (cifs_sb)
> - pTcon = cifs_sb->tcon;
> - else
> - return -EIO;
> -
> - xid = GetXid();
> - if (pTcon) {
> - cFYI(1, ("pqstats %p", qstats));
> - } else
> - rc = -EIO;
> -
> - FreeXid(xid);
> - return rc;
> -}
> -
> -static const struct quotactl_ops cifs_quotactl_ops = {
> - .set_xquota = cifs_xquota_set,
> - .get_xquota = cifs_xquota_get,
> - .set_xstate = cifs_xstate_set,
> - .get_xstate = cifs_xstate_get,
> -};
> -#endif
> -
> static void cifs_umount_begin(struct super_block *sb)
> {
> struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(sb);
> --
> 1.6.3.3
>
>
--
Thanks,
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists