[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B69CC24.3050503@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:19:00 +0100
From: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
To: Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] MX1/MX2: -EINVAL overwritten in second iteration in mxc_gpio_setup_multiple_pins()
Due to the `ret = gpio_request()' below in the loop, the initial -EINVAL value
of ret is overwritten.
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
---
Not 100% sure this is needed, please review. One more question: is it ok
to return 0 when count is 0 (and nothing is done)?
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/iomux-mx1-mx2.c b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/iomux-mx1-mx2.c
index a37163c..25023ac 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/iomux-mx1-mx2.c
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/iomux-mx1-mx2.c
@@ -116,14 +116,16 @@ int mxc_gpio_setup_multiple_pins(const int *pin_list, unsigned count,
int i;
unsigned gpio;
unsigned mode;
- int ret = -EINVAL;
+ int ret;
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
gpio = *p & (GPIO_PIN_MASK | GPIO_PORT_MASK);
mode = *p & ~(GPIO_PIN_MASK | GPIO_PORT_MASK);
- if (gpio >= (GPIO_PORT_MAX + 1) * 32)
+ if (gpio >= (GPIO_PORT_MAX + 1) * 32) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
goto setup_error;
+ }
ret = gpio_request(gpio, label);
if (ret)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists