linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/14] avr32: use generic ptrace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 3 Feb 2010 20:22:23 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:	Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com>,
	roland@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	hskinnemoen@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/14] avr32: use generic ptrace_resume code

On 02/03, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> I don't think the flag clearing on PTRACE_KILL matters as the process
> is a zombie and almost gone anyway, it's more an artefact of the
> generic implementation that I wanted to mention.

Well, PTRACE_KILL doesn't necessarily kill the tracee. Only if the
tracee reported the signal or syscall, otherwise ->exit_code is
ignored.

OTOH I agree, probably the flag clearing on PTRACE_KILL doesn't
really matter beause PTRACE_KILL shouldn't be used at all.


The whole series looks "obviously good" to me, but of course
this is up to arch maintaners.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/