[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100203192223.GA12039@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 20:22:23 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com>,
roland@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
hskinnemoen@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/14] avr32: use generic ptrace_resume code
On 02/03, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> I don't think the flag clearing on PTRACE_KILL matters as the process
> is a zombie and almost gone anyway, it's more an artefact of the
> generic implementation that I wanted to mention.
Well, PTRACE_KILL doesn't necessarily kill the tracee. Only if the
tracee reported the signal or syscall, otherwise ->exit_code is
ignored.
OTOH I agree, probably the flag clearing on PTRACE_KILL doesn't
really matter beause PTRACE_KILL shouldn't be used at all.
The whole series looks "obviously good" to me, but of course
this is up to arch maintaners.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists