[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8bd0f97a1002031136h2573b05cr8dada3bd78ffaa38@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 14:36:47 -0500
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: roland@...hat.com, oleg@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/14] blackfin: use generic ptrace_resume code
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 15:29, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 13:59, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Use the generic ptrace_resume code for PTRACE_SYSCALL, PTRACE_CONT,
>> PTRACE_KILL and PTRACE_SINGLESTEP. This implies defining
>> arch_has_single_step in <asm/ptrace.h> and implementing the
>> user_enable_single_step and user_disable_single_step functions, which
>> also causes the breakpoint information to be cleared on fork, which
>> could be considered a bug fix.
>>
>> Also the TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE thread flag is now cleared on PTRACE_KILL
>> which it previously wasn't which is consistent with all architectures
>> using the modern ptrace code.
>
> i have local code in the Blackfin tree that does part of this patch
> (and has been tested), so i'll split this patch apart and merge into
> my tree. thanks!
i added tracehook support to Blackfin recently, so that covered all
the new functions here. i just had to drop the handling of the
PTRACE_xxx things that common code already does.
when did you want to push through these updates ? i was planning on
sending these ptrace() updates through the Blackfin tree as part of my
2.6.34 queue. i'm guessing you didnt want this stuff in 2.6.33 ...
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists