[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100203084737.6e01247b@siona>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:47:37 +0530
From: Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: roland@...hat.com, oleg@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
hskinnemoen@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/14] avr32: use generic ptrace_resume code
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 19:58:57 +0100
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> Use the generic ptrace_resume code for PTRACE_SYSCALL, PTRACE_CONT,
> PTRACE_KILL and PTRACE_SINGLESTEP. This implies defining
> arch_has_single_step in <asm/ptrace.h> and implementing the
> user_enable_single_step and user_disable_single_step functions, which
> also causes the breakpoint information to be cleared on fork, which
> could be considered a bug fix.
>
> Also the TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE thread flag is now cleared on PTRACE_KILL
> which it previously wasn't which is consistent with all architectures
> using the modern ptrace code.
>
> Currently avr32 doesn't implement any code to disable single stepping
> when one of the non-syscall requests is called which seems wrong,
> but I've left it as-is for now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Acked-by: Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com>
Sounds like you found three bugs and fixed two of them. Can you tell me
more about the last one, i.e. what should be done to disable
single-stepping?
Haavard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists